IN FOCUS

more

India liberalizes regime for foreign technology transfer and intellectual property licensing agreements

In a welcome development, the Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP) of the Ministry of Commerce & Industry has removed curbs on the payment of royalties to foreign partners under technology transfer agreements and IP licensing agreements entered into between an Indian entity and a foreign entity. Press Note No. 8 of 2009 issued by DIPP states that the Government of India has reviewed the extant policy and “has decided to permit, with immediate effect, payments for royalty, lumpsum fee for transfer of technology and payments for use of trademark/brand name on the automatic route i.e. without any approval of the Government of India.” The Government plans to separately notify at a later date, a “post-reporting system” for all such agreements.

Read More

more

New Expert Taskforce on Global Knowledge Governance

According to the launch announcement , the taskforce has been created to contribute to the debate on the appropriate governance arrangements for IP rights, given that ‘knowledge’ is now key to innovation, growth and competitiveness and is therefore crucial in enabling societies and nations in meeting their political, economic and social challenges.

Read More

more

For GE - "Reverse innovation isn’t optional, its oxygen"

According to an illuminating article co-authored by GE Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt; GE’s chief innovation consultant Vijay Govindarajan, and Chris Trimble, GE needs to disrupt itself and reverse its decades-old traditional business model based upon the glocalization approach. This article published recently in the Harvard Business Review, makes the argument that GE now needs to master “reverse innovation” not only to fully exploit the large emerging markets in developing countries but also to protect its market leadership position from attack by large emerging corporate giants, who these GE leaders think could otherwise “destroy” GE. Glocalization (where companies like GE develop high-end products for home markets – read US and Western Europe – and then adapt them for other markets around the world) is no longer a complete business strategy suited to a flattened global economy.

Read More

more

Political deal reached on single EU Patent and a single European Patent Court

The Council of the European Union meeting as the Competitiveness Council arrived at an in-principle agreement on 4 December 2009 to introduce a single EU Patent and create a European and EU Patents Court (EEUPC). This takes the European Union a step closer to a single market for patents though tough hurdles still remain. The critical issue of what would be the system’s official language and how translations into 23 official EU languages would be effected is still to be resolved and the Commission will present a separate proposal for this next year.

Read More

The five largest intellectual property offices in the world have launched a collaborative forum with a website . The IP5 Offices as the forum is called is guided by the vision of “the elimination of unnecessary duplication of work among the IP5 Offices, the enhancement of patent examination efficiency and quality and guarantee of the stability of patent right”. This is an extension of the former trilateral cooperation between the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to include the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) and the State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China (SIPO).

Read More

A very recent and useful volume (Jeremy de Beer, Implementing the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Development Agenda, Wilfrid Laurier University Press/CIGI/IDRC 2009) with contributions from leading experts from around the world, is available to read and download in full on the website of the International Development Research Centre (IDRC).

Read More